Thursday, March 15, 2007

OPEC Fears a US Recession

MoneyNews | REUTERS | Thursday, March 15, 2007 | LONDON -- OPEC on Thursday raised slightly its forecast for world oil demand growth, although it voiced concern about possible economic weakness that could erode oil demand.

The Organization of the Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC), source of more than a third of the world's oil, predicted this year's world oil demand growth would be 1.3 million barrels per day (bpd), up 0.1 million bpd from its previous estimate.

It also predicted demand for its crude would average 30.4 million bpd this year, up from its previous forecast of 30.25 million bpd.

Oil prices have recovered from a low of $49.90 for U.S. crude hit in January this year.

But they have been buffeted by nervous selling that has spilt over from equity markets shaken by concerns about the health of the U.S. economy.

"Central Banks have been quick to respond, reassuring markets that the underlying economic conditions remain sound," OPEC wrote in its Monthly Oil Market Report. "However, potential downside risks to the world economic outlook are coming to the fore."

OPEC ministers meeting in Vienna on Thursday have also expressed concern about possible economic weakness.

They were widely expected to leave existing output curbs in place even though inventory levels have declined.

The ten OPEC members with supply curbs pumped 29.96 million bpd in February, broadly unchanged from the previous month, OPEC said, citing estimates from secondary sources.

In its monthly report on Tuesday, the International Energy Agency said inventories in industrialised nations could be headed for their biggest fall in more than 10 years and said the world would need more OPEC oil in the coming months.

OPEC said a fall in U.S. stocks of refined products over the past weeks had coincided with refinery outages and that product markets could lose some of their strength once maintenance is completed.

SPY PHOTOS: Mercedes CLS Facelift

SPY PHOTOS: Mercedes CLS Facelift


Copyright by Lehmann Photo-Syndication
view larger
SPY PHOTOS: Mercedes CLS Facelift
by Hans G. Lehmann
Copyright Lehmann Photo-Syndication
March 15, 2007

First restyling since lainch in 2004

DaimlerChrysler’s successful four door coupe CLS is about to get its first restyling. The photos are showing a prototype in cold weather testing. Quite visibly the car is featuring a completely new front grille in the style of its big brother CL, and also the rear end – still under cover – gets all new taillights and a new bumper.

The current CLS came on the market in August 2004, so one can expect the facelift to be scheduled for release in 2008.


PY PHOTOS: Mercedes CLS Facelift PY PHOTOS: Mercedes CLS Facelift PY PHOTOS: Mercedes CLS Facelift

Dreaming of a New Chrysler


2007 Chrysler 300
2007 Chrysler 300

I have already written about the worst thing that could happen to Chrysler: Takeover by a vulture that resells the richest parts — Jeep and the minivan plants — and shuts the remainder. That would be the end of Chrysler.

Now think of the best that can happen. A fabulously wealthy American or a group of American private equity investors takes over Chrysler. The buyers are — gulp — patriots. They want to save the company and all those jobs for America. They want to prove that Americans can still do it. You know, like when Richard Gere sees the light in Pretty Woman and decides to build big, beautiful ships instead of breaking up that shipyard and selling the pieces. Patriotism aside, these steel-willed investors know that with the right leadership and products, Chrysler can make billions of dollars of year. The buyers also know that they could become filthy rich in a few years after they fix the company and take it public again.

So how do they revive Chrysler?

Start by recruiting great leaders. Offer Dieter Zetsche the job. He should be happy to quit that pain-in-the-neck job as chief executive of Daimler and join a bigger company, American Chrysler. He can get a piece of the action and become fabulously wealthy, live in Bloomfield Hills again and be the toast of the town. Just remind Mrs. Zetsche that she cannot serve beer to teenagers over here.

If Zetsche could offer Wolfgang Bernhard the No. 2 position, it would be perfect. The Wolfman did a fine job at Chrysler a few years ago and then did the same at Volkswagen. Get those two back, and Chrysler would be halfway home. Maybe they could get Tom Stallkamp, who is currently a partner in a private equity firm, to come back and handle suppliers again. He is great.

Of course, product would be management's biggest challenge. For example, the new midsize Chrysler Sebring and Dodge Avenger passenger cars are close — but close only counts in horseshoes. They need sharpening, such as six-speed transmissions on all models, better ride and handling, and better materials in their interiors. The company should also try to reduce its dependence on Hyundai and Mitsubishi in developing vehicles and engines. Chrysler's own would be better. These joint-venture platforms and motors are new, so Chrysler has several years to design and engineer its own replacements.

The full-size passenger cars — the Chrysler 300, Dodge Charger, Dodge Magnum and Challenger coupe (coming) — have been successful, so the company needs to nurture this franchise. A few suggestions: Pay more attention to reliability, fit and finish and evolving the bold design of these vehicles. And sell the fuel economy of that Hemi V8 with the cylinder cutoff. It's really stingy on the highway.

I think that the company should also build the Imperial, a show car based on the Chrysler 300. Limo companies are tired of the old Lincoln Town Car, and the market is ripe for a fresh entry to grab this business. Chrysler's Canadian plant has enough capacity to build the Imperial.

Chrysler should also rethink its "B-segment" small car. The current plan is to have one built in China. Rethink quickly. Chinese manufacturers are still working their way up the learning curve. If management does not trust the Chinese to deliver a high-quality vehicle, then find another low-cost answer like Mexico, which already builds a number of good vehicles, such as the Nissan Versa, Chrysler PT Cruiser and Ford Fusion. Mexico should pay for the plant, as our Southern states do.

2007 Chrysler Aspen
2007 Chrysler Aspen

Trucks are another key part of a Chrysler revival plan. The company is getting a gift from both General Motors and Ford, which are both exiting the minivan business. The big challenge is going head to head with Honda and Toyota, but also with Hyundai/Kia Motors, which now has a strong minivan entry. Chrysler will have a new minivan this fall, and it should redouble its efforts to ensure a successful launch.

The Dodge Ram big pickup is still a strong seller. Again, the company must continue to improve and refine this vehicle to fight off the new GM and Toyota challenge. In the meantime, the company is losing ground with the small Dakota pickup and its large SUVs, the Dodge Durango and new Chrysler Aspen. The current plan is to shut the Newark, Del., assembly plant where it builds those SUVs. I think that Chrysler should revisit this strategy and try to come up with a way to either revive or replace those struggling vehicles and keep the plant going. Anyone can shut a plant; the trick is to create vehicles that we want and will pay top dollar to get.

Jeep is Chrysler's strongest card. The new four-door Wrangler is a big hit, and it does a great job of reinforcing the rugged image of Jeep. That is not the case with the "sissy Jeeps," as I called them — those two new ones, Compass and Patriot, built off a car platform. For the most part, these Jeeps have failed to impress the automotive press. Even so, they have a good future if Chrysler improves on their shortcomings.

The Grand Cherokee has been the cornerstone of the Jeep franchise. Here is the trouble. Sales are falling because there is so much competition, and, frankly, Grand Cherokee is no longer one of the leaders in handling, quality or value. A Grand Cherokee derivative, the relatively new Jeep Commander, a version with three rows of seats, is awful-looking and needs better packaging for rear passengers. Redesign it and go back to that terrific name from Jeep's past, Grand Wagoneer. It was a winner, so use it.

While Chrysler is not strong in most foreign markets — and that is one of the shortcomings of the company — it does have one global name: Jeep. Let us not forget that Jeep rides over rough terrain, and most of the new growing markets are rough terrain: China, India, Russia and Africa. So build Jeeps where the building is cheap — in India, maybe — and use that as an export base for an assault on global markets.

Dealers are another crucial piece of the puzzle, and the dealer body today is not a happy one. I think that the new Chrysler should start by rethinking the drive to combine Chrysler, Jeep and Dodge dealers. The company has already merged many of these dealerships, but the goal should be to create future exclusive franchises.

Create a new Plymouth franchise. The base vehicle would be the new Plymouth PT Cruiser, but add a panel truck and something like the glitzy two-door show car. Give the next version of the PT convertible four doors. Chrysler could start out using Toyota's Scion model — carving out a Plymouth Center in some existing showrooms.

Marketing and advertising: Ask Mike Jackson what do about marketing and whom to hire. Mike is the chief executive of AutoNation and the best there is. He would help. Chrysler marketing seems to consist of "Put another spiff on the metal." They have to learn to sell, as GM is learning. The company has to avoid disasters such as the "Lingerie Bowl" fiasco of a few years ago.

Chrysler designer to talk Tuesday at UM-Flint Kiva

FLINT
THE FLINT JOURNAL FIRST EDITION
Thursday, March 15, 2007
By James M. Miller
JOURNAL STAFF WRITER

FLINT - Ralph Gilles, designer of the Chrysler 300C sedan, will talk about auto design at noon Tuesday in the Kiva at the University of Michigan-Flint.

The talk is free and open to the public.

Gilles, vice president of Jeep and truck design at the Chrysler Group, was invited to meet with communications and art students at UM-Flint, and the public relations class coordinating the visit decided to add a public event to his visit.

Gilles was born in New York, N.Y., and grew up in Montreal. He attended the Center for Creative Studies in Detroit and later received an executive master's of business administration degree from Michigan State University.

He joined Chrysler in 1991 and was director of the Dodge Magnum, Chrysler 300C and Charger projects and the Dodge M80 concept vehicle.

The Kiva is in UM-Flint's University Center building.

- James M. Miller

Chinese are not ready to buy Chrysler

Alysha Webb is the China Bureau Chief of Automotive News.

ALYSHA WEBB

Alysha Webb | Automotive News / March 15, 2007 - 10:12 am

SHANGHAI -- Several Chinese companies have been mentioned as possible purchasers of the Chrysler group. Anyone taking this seriously doesn't understand China's auto industry.

China's industry is like a gangly teenager who needs to shave but doesn't know how. If a Chinese company were to buy Chrysler, the result would range from a face covered with tiny cuts to a slit jugular vein.

Chrysler is tempting to Chinese automakers, which are looking at mature international markets with envy. Chrysler has advanced technology, a huge dealer network and well-known brand names.

Money to buy Chrysler would not be a problem. Loans available at favorable rates would be available from China's government if it endorsed the purchase.

But running a huge international automaker takes management talent that Chinese automakers lack.

The most talented Chinese managers are getting a good handle on the thriving industry in China. But their knowledge of business outside China is modest.

Take unions. Chinese companies have no experience dealing with such tough and demanding unions as the UAW and the Canadian Auto Workers.

U.S. politics would be another black hole for the Chinese. Imagine the political uproar if a Chinese company tried to buy Chrysler.

Beijing is encouraging Chinese companies to go international, and the U.S. market looks mighty tempting. But Chrysler would be the wrong road into the United States.

DaimlerChrysler - Brand Trademark updates

Serial Number Reg. Number Word Mark Check Status Live/Dead
1 78888762
ATTENTION ASSIST TARR LIVE
2 78884416
EDITION 10 TARR LIVE
3 78829982
ASSYST TARR LIVE
4 78821959
E 320 TARR LIVE
5 78793657
BI-FLEX TARR LIVE
6 78779119
NUCELLSYS TARR LIVE
7 78749692
PROVETECH:SD TARR LIVE
8 78622242
TRAIL GUIDE TARR LIVE
9 78950153
CGI TARR LIVE

DaimlerChrysler Trademark Update

Serial Number Reg. Number Word Mark Check Status Live/Dead
1 77081265
DAIMLERCHRYSLER COMMERCIAL BUSES NORTH AMERICA TARR LIVE
2 77080639
DC DIRECT TARR LIVE

DaimlerChrysler workers vote in favour of cuts

toronto.ctv.ca

DaimlerChrysler vehicles (AP / David Zalubowski)

DaimlerChrysler vehicles (AP / David Zalubowski)

Unionized workers at DaimlerChrysler's Brampton, Ont. plant agreed to two key requests from the troubled automaker on Sunday to cut shift premiums and outsource janitorial work to keep the facility running.

The decision is a reversal by the Canadian Auto Workers Local 1285 members after the company hinted it would look elsewhere to make investments.

Workers voted to accept the package of changes but their concessions are contingent on DaimlerChrysler making a $700 million investment to build a fifth model at the plant.

Brampton's plant already builds the Chrysler 300 sedan, Dodge Magnum and Charger. It is slated to start producing the Challenger muscle car. The investment will go towards making a new vehicle at the facility, believed to be the new full-sized Chrysler Imperial.

Cutting shift premiums will cost workers about $5,000 each every year. They had received the premium of 48 minutes a shift when the plant moved from two to three shifts a few years ago.

Other changes include 44 janitorial jobs being contracted out and a reorganization of work responsibilities around team concepts, the Toronto Star reported.

Union members voted 78 per cent in favour of the changes, less than three weeks after rejecting the plan.

"It was definitely a hard decision for the membership to make," Ardis Snow, Local 1285 plant chairman told the Star.

"But I think they looked at the company's response to the 'no' vote and felt it was a real threat to their long-term future," Ardis added.

Chrysler Hung Up on Imperial Production

Canadian Auto Press(Canadian Auto Press) - 3/15/2007

Chrysler Group had some pretty impressive debuts at the 2006 North American
2006 Chrysler Imperial Concept
Chrysler wants to build the magestic Imperial, but the CAW says, no way. At least not with a pay cut... (Photo: Justin Couture, Canadian Auto Press)
International Auto Show a year ago January. Dodge wheeled out the Caliber, the little hatchback with SUV spirit that continues to sell like hotcakes. Jeep also had the new Wrangler in both two and four door variants. But the buzz of the show focused on the group's concepts. There was the '70s, retro-in-every-way Challenger muscle car concept, and the Imperial, Chrysler's idea of what an ultra-luxury sedan from the winged American brand might be. The two concepts brought attention to Chrysler group, the former was admired by muscle car and Mopar enthusiasts, while the Imperial created new insight into Chrysler's vision for a continued climb up-market… not to mention a fair bit of controversy over its design thanks to Rolls-Royce Phantom-inspired styling, rear-hinged doors, and glitzy exterior.Since that time, Chrysler has officially announced the production of the Challenger, and that assembly of the car will commence in Canada for 2008. But the sporty two-door isn't the only vehicle that Chrysler Group is green-lighting. Apparently, the Imperial
2006 Chrysler Imperial Concept
Imperial would stir up the full-size sedan market, namely the Lincoln Town Car and the Caddy DTS. (Photo: Chrysler)
is to be built as well, though Chrysler's having a bit of difficulty getting the gears moving on this project.

According to Ward's Auto World, the workers at the Brampton, Ontario, Canada assembly facility that produces the LX-chassis cars (300, Magnum, Charger) were offered a proposal that would secure them the contract to build a vehicle internally dubbed “Product X”, keeping the plant on a three-shift schedule in exchange for a wage cut of $115 per week. Sources told Ward's that the identity of "Product X" is the Chrysler Imperial. Despite the endorsement of the Canadian Auto Worker's union leaders, the workers of the plant voted against the vehicle with overwhelming disapproval.

Bob Chernicki, assistant to Buzz Hargrove, the Canadian Auto Worker's President, said "Is it unfortunate? You'd better
2006 Chrysler Imperial Concept
Nevertheless, Chrysler seems positive that the unions won't affect production schedules up 'til 2009. (Photo: Chrysler)
believe it... Is it the wrong way to do it? Absolutely. We are disappointed in the decision. But hey, that's democracy. And that's what works in our union." On the flip side of the coin, a spokesman from Chrysler said the union's vote would have no affect on the group's production plans through 2009.

What does this mean for Chrysler Group? Keeping in mind that the Imperial would ride on the next-generation large-car platform (LY), Chrysler's only realistic solution is to return to the bargaining table or drop the car outright. Besides the Magna-Steyr owned Graz, Austria plant that builds European market and right-hand drive 300s, the only other facility in the world that produces LX cars is Brampton. For a car that's predicted to sell in smaller volumes than any of the LX cars, it simply wouldn't make sense to do it any other way. However, if all goes according to plan, the Chrysler Imperial should be launched in three years.

Interestingly, the Detroit Free Press reported on Monday that Chrysler's Brampton union workers have voted on a different matter, the subject of pay (different to the one mentioned above). They've agreed to outsource some of the janitorial jobs and accept a cutback in "premium pay", a generous 40 minute per day "break", where workers are paid, but not working. Annually, this costs Chrysler $5,000 per hourly worker.
Copyright © Canadian Auto Press

Maybach Exelero Road Test & Review - Part 2


Unlike most styling exercises, the Exelero is definitely a runner. On May 1, it proved its point on the Nardo high-speed oval in Italy, where racing driver Klaus Ludwig whipped it to a top speed of 351.45 kph (218 mph). I ran out of road at an indicated 125 mph, but a 0-to-62-mph run was pretty exciting, as the Maybach fisted past the wilting roadside daisies to clock 4.4 seconds. That's Porsche 911 GT3 territory, not bad for a converted luxury liner that weighs three tons counting fuel and Kacher. The dry weight is an almost equally obese 5852 pounds.

Redlined at 6000 rpm, the 36-valve V-12 produces peak power at just 5000 rpm. Compared with the standard Maybach 57/62 engine that's rated at a mere 543 hp, the Exelero has more displacement (up from 5.5 to 5.9 liters), bigger turbochargers, a manlier radiator, and a larger intercooler.



It's soon time for serious leadfoot action. During the morning warm-up, an overenthusiastic crew member warped a pair of front brake discs, so I'm told to take it easy with the second and final set of rotors. No one says anything about saving the tires, so I turn the traction control off, at which point the wide-body coupe duly sheds any semblance of manners. On hot, dry pavement, you have wheel spin in first, second, and third gears. Since peak twist action enters the party early at 2500 rpm, a mild stab at the throttle is enough to kick out the tail and cause paroxysms in the stability system.



But maintaining that sideways action is trickier than expected, because the transmission feels compelled to change down when you massage the throttle a little too hard, and it changes up the moment your hoof loosens its grip. This is fine when you are out to play in a C55 or an E55, but the adrenaline triples when the star of the slide show is a prototype worth 5 million euros. And I'm not telling how many times this one got away from me.

Cool-off time is frequently needed with this car. As its recalibrated air suspension hisses like a dragon, I learn more about the project. The cooperation between Maybach and Fulda dates back to 1938, when the carmaker conceived a radically shaped streamliner, the W38 Stromlinienfahrzeug, with special body by Dцrr & Schreck, for high-speed tire testing. Almost seven decades later, the two marques teamed up again to crack the 350-kph (217-mph) barrier. "In a way, the Exelero was built around our new 315/25YR-23 Carat Exelero tires," explains Fulda's Stohrer. Weissinger nods in agreement: "That's why the coupe is 6.3 inches wider than a standard 57/62, at 84.3 inches wide."

(Source Automobilemag)

Magna seeks Chrysler revival


J.P. MOCZULSKI/REUTERS FILE PHOTO
Magna International Inc. chairman Frank Stronach, seen in this file photo, wants to help ailing Chrysler Group and invest in the company’s vehicle production without angering other auto parts customers.

ar 15, 2007 04:30 AM
Business Reporter

Auto-industry czar Frank Stronach says Magna International Inc. wants to help ailing Chrysler Group and invest in the company's vehicle production, but avoid putting itself in a position of competing against other parts customers.

Stronach, chairman of Aurora-based Magna, said in a lengthy interview yesterday the company has no intention of raising the ire or losing the business of its other big parts customers like General Motors and Ford by pursuing Chrysler.

"The message I want to get across is we do not want to compete with any customer," Stronach stressed. "We want to be of service. We would invest monies with our customers," but notcompete with them.

Quoting people familiar with discussions concerning Chrysler's future, one report said earlier yesterday that Magna is among the "front-runners" to buy the company, the North American arm of DaimlerChrysler AG of Germany.

Other companies looking at Chrysler are U.S.-based Cerberus Capital Management and a team that includes Blackstone Group and Centerbridge Partners, according to Bloomberg News.

But Stronach, who is also Magna's founder and controlling shareholder, repeated that any investment would not put the company at odds with its other customers who compete with Chrysler.

"If something is sick, you want to get the patient to health again and then demonstrate `look, we don't want to compete,'" he said.

Magna, the world's third-largest auto parts maker with annual sales of about $24.1 billion (U.S.), has been trying to expand its parts design, engineering and production capabilities in North America to include vehicle assembly in recent years.

"We would put maybe half of the monies or maybe a third to develop (a model) and then drive along with the success," Stronach said.

"We've told our customers `look, lets work together. We could build high quality cars at low prices.'"

Magna already produces vehicles for several auto makers including Chrysler at its assembly plant in Austria. Stronach's remarks suggest Magna now sees an investment opportunity at Chrysler to make more cars and trucks for the auto giant, rather than take a run at buying it.

A purchase price of $4 billion to $5 billion for Chrysler would also saddle Magna with debt in an industry in which overcapacity is driving down prices and profits.

Magna experienced a brush with bankruptcy in the early 1990s and Stronach almost lost the company and control. Since then, Magna has posted some of the strongest balance sheets in the industry and remained vigilant in keeping debt down.

Buzz Hargrove, president of the Canadian Auto Workers union, said it is difficult to understand why any company would want to risk buying an auto maker in view of the vicious competition in the industry around the world.

Uncertainty about Chrysler's future increased last month when Dieter Zetsche, chair of German parent DaimlerChrysler AG, said it was examining all options for the North American division. His revelation came on the same day the Chrysler Group announced a restructuring plan after losing $1.5 billion (U.S.) last year.

Magna officials say the company is currently trying to gain an understanding of Chrysler's situation and won't comment on any subsequent action.

The outspoken Stronach was unusually tight-lipped about discussions and options involving Chrysler, Magna's biggest customer. The auto maker represents about 25 per cent of Magna's sales.

"It's very sensitive right now."

In view of Chrysler's importance to Magna, Stronach also said an ownership change could have serious consequences for his company, workers and communities.

Analysts say a new owner might be intent on downsizing the company to maximize profits over a short period of time.

"It's a concern," Stronach noted. "All those things go through our minds."

Chery Nice For Chrysler

Shu-Ching Jean Chen, 03.15.07, 3:00 AM ETHONG KONG -


A shining blue subcompact hatchback displayed on the Web site of the Chinese state-owned automaker Chery Automobile is soon to be touted by DaimlerChrysler to cost-conscious buyers in the U.S. and Europe.

Three years in the making, the car, called the A1, is slated to debut at the Shanghai Auto Show in April, and as part of its recently established partnership with DaimlerChrysler (nyse: DCX - news - people ), Chery says it will be sold under the Chrysler brand in Europe and North America, aimed at trendy young white-collar professionals and female consumers.

The A1 model features a stylish dashboard with three cone-shaped meter displays, a body designed by Italy’s Bertone Group, famed for its work for Porsche, and a British-designed grey leather interior with cream-colored seats.

According to China Auto News, the car, produced at an estimated cost of 50,000 yuan ($6,460), is likely to be sold under Chrysler’s Dodge brand. Another Chinese newspaper said the sticker price would be between 50,000 yuan and 80,000 yuan ($10,335), citing a Chery retailer in Guangzhou.

There is a growing market around the world for small, cheap, fuel-efficient cars, and DaimlerChrysler is looking to China and Chery to help it enter that market inexpensively.

DaimlerChrysler’s board approved a preliminary deal with Chery on small vehicles last month with an eye to finalize an agreement by the end of March. Under the terms, Chery-built vehicles will be distributed under Chrysler brands mainly in North America and Western Europe, in ways similar to existing ventures between Western automakers and Asian manufacturers in the price-sensitive, high fuel economy segment.

It’s not just DaimlerChrysler that has high hopes for A1. Chery is calling it a watershed product for the company that it hopes will solidify its presence on the world stage as an auto exporter to be reckoned with. Its direct competitors in the international markets will be Nissan Motor (nasdaq: NSANY - news - people )'s March and Toyota Motor (nyse: TM - news - people )'s Yaris.

It is unclear what would happen to the partnership if the Chrysler division is sold. (See: “ An Independent Chrysler?”)

In race for Chrysler, investors may not win

DaimlerChrysler (DCX) stock has gained 7 percent to $69.19 a share since it hinted Feb. 14 it may sell its ailing Chrysler Group. Yet while a sale would help DaimlerChrysler's bottom line, it won't do much near-term for the stock or its sector.

"Automakers are in a real pickle," says Jack Ablin, chief investment officer at Harris Private Bank, citing slumping demand, competition from Japanese automakers and soaring worker-benefits obligations. "It's like they're not in the auto business — they're in the pension and health-care business, and they just sell cars to fund that," he says.

Indeed, Chrysler Group — like GM and Ford — is laden with debt. Deutsche Bank analyst Rod Lache values Chrysler at $15 billion excluding debt. But its liabilities for worker pensions and health-care benefits total $18 billion. On that basis, he quips, DaimlerChrysler should theoretically pay a buyer $3 billion to take Chrysler off its hands.

"In Detroit, some homeowners with negative equity have been known to push their keys through the letterbox and vanish. DaimlerChrysler may be looking to seek a similar walk-away solution for Chrysler," says Citigroup analyst John Lawson, who rates Daimler a "hold."

Chrysler lost $1.475 billion in 2006 but its purchase price will likely be based on future results. Lawson predicts a profit by 2009.

Jeep and Marvel launched “The Patriot Factor”

Patriot drive starts with NCAA tourney
Chrysler is also using a comic book and an interactive online site.


PATRIOTADVENTURE.COM
Jeep and Marvel launched “The Patriot Factor” online in February.
Click here for more information about Alex Gary

The Chrysler Group is tapping into America’s love of March Madness, comic books and adventure to sell the Jeep Patriot, the last of the three new vehicles being turned out by workers at Chrysler’s Belvidere assembly plant.

Chrysler is launching its media campaign to coincide with the beginning of the NCAA Division I men’s basketball tournament, which begins today and runs until April 2.

Basketball fans will see sports-themed Patriot banners on a cornucopia of sports Web sites, such as ESPN.com, SportingNews.com and SportsIllustrated.com, and two Patriot televisions ads will air frequently on CBS Sports, College Sports TV, Fox Sports and College Hoops Network.But Jeep and Chrysler, adopting the new wave of media saturation, are going way beyond TV. In February, Jeep and Marvel comics unveiled “The Patriot Factor,” an online adventure comic book at patriotadventure.com where users are providing the story line.

And today, Jeep is introducing the online interactive film on the same site, “The Way Beyond Trail,” where you become the fourth member of a group of friends driving a Jeep Patriot while searching for buried treasure. There are 44 scenes ranging from 15 to 30 seconds where you help the group decide what to do. It’s possible to complete the adventure in fewer than 44 scenes, but many of the scenes are dead ends.

The advertising and online campaigns match the company’s theme for selling the Patriot, “choose your adventure.”

“The Jeep Patriot is targeted at young, active men and women who always wanted a Jeep but couldn’t afford one,” John Plecha, director of Jeep Marketing, said in a news release. “Now these consumers can choose their adventure in a Jeep Patriot because it delivers the Jeep experience at an affordable starting price — $14,985.”

The Patriot, which strongly resembles the old Jeep Cherokee, started rolling out of the Belvidere plant at the end of December, nearly a year after workers started putting together the Dodge Caliber. With about 3,600 workers, the plant is the Rock River Valley’s largest manufacturing employer. The Jeep Compass started production last May.

Dodge’s marketing team is selling the Caliber under the slogan “anything but cute,” while Jeep’s Compass campaign centers on the message “freedom in a whole new dimension.”

The three vehicles replaced the Dodge Neon, which had a 12-year run in Belvidere, and are being counted on heavily to lift Chrysler to profitability. DaimlerChrysler’s Chrysler Group sales slumped last year because of its heavy reliance on SUVs, trucks and minivans in a year when gasoline prices topped $3 a gallon.

The Caliber, Compass and Patriot are all capable, depending on the version you buy, of getting 30 miles to the gallon.

2007-03-15 06:07 (Mb 5.7) KEPULAUAN TALAUD, INDONESIA 4.2 126.6


Magnitude 5.7
Date-Time
  • Thursday, March 15, 2007 at 06:07:55 (UTC)
    = Coordinated Universal Time
  • Thursday, March 15, 2007 at 2:07:55 PM
    = local time at epicenter
  • Time of Earthquake in other Time Zones
    Location 4.219°N, 126.794°E
    Depth 10 km (6.2 miles) set by location program
    Region KEPULAUAN TALAUD, INDONESIA
    Distances 260 km (160 miles) SE of General Santos, Mindanao, Philippines
    335 km (205 miles) SSE of Davao, Mindanao, Philippines
    1305 km (810 miles) SSE of MANILA, Philippines
    2475 km (1540 miles) ENE of JAKARTA, Java, Indonesia
    Location Uncertainty horizontal +/- 8.2 km (5.1 miles); depth fixed by location program
    Parameters Nst= 77, Nph= 77, Dmin=342.5 km, Rmss=1.03 sec, Gp= 43°,
    M-type=body magnitude (Mb), Version=7
    Source USGS NEIC (WDCS-D)
    Event ID us2007zyag

    This Day in Auto History: 15 MARCH

    Automobile Quarterly
    Automobile Quarterly
    This Day in Auto History:

    3.15.1905
    George Russell of General Motors is born in Glasgow, Scotland
    3.15.1913
    Racer Jack Fairman is born in Smallfield, Surrey, England
    3.15.1937
    Automotive historian William G. Holder is born in Richmond, IN
    3.15.1954
    Plymouth offers power brakes as a $36.55 option
    3.15.1961
    Soviet automotive engineer N. R. Briling dies in Moscow at age 84

    Source: Automobile History Day By Day, by Douglas A. Wick

    Wednesday, March 14, 2007

    Statement from Chrysler CEO Tom LaSorda

    March 14, 2007

    Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me to testify before you on the subject of climate change. DaimlerChrysler is committed to developing new, advanced technologies, which minimize the effects our products and processes have on global climate and the environment in general. We recognize that climate change and national security are serious concerns that require all of us – individuals, industry and government – to take actions to help reduce our dependence on oil and emissions of CO2. And, we have already taken actions to do so.

    DaimlerChrysler has long been committed to reducing petroleum consumption and emissions of greenhouse gases of its motor vehicles.

    • We have produced more than 1.5 million flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) —vehicles capable of running on E85—in spite of the limited availability of E85 fuel to consumers. That is more than 10 percent of our production over the past nine years, a higher percentage than any other manufacturer. We stand ready to make, by 2012, 50 percent of our production as either FFVs or vehicles capable of running on biodiesel.

    • DaimlerChrysler offers seven clean-diesel models this year – providing improved fuel economy of 30 percent and greenhouse gas reductions of 20 percent. As we announced at the Washington Auto Show in January, our new heavy-duty Dodge Ram diesel meets the stringent, 50-state, 2010 emission standards TODAY. And, we are actively pushing for the adoption of a national standard for B20 biodiesel fuel to speed its adoption in the marketplace.

    • We are partners in a global alliance in hybrid development with GM and BMW in developing a new hybrid system that we expect will leapfrog the competition. The first Chrysler Group product – the Dodge Durango – will be on sale in 2008.

    • DaimlerChrysler is a leader in producing hybrid diesel-electric buses through our Orion transit bus brand. We also have the only demonstration fleet of plug-in hybrids in service – our Dodge Sprinter vans.

    • As you may not know, we are the world’s leader in fuel cell vehicle production, with more than 100 vehicles – ranging from small passenger cars to city transit buses – in worldwide operation today. Thirty-two of these are in the U.S. We are putting significant resources into developing these new types of propulsion with the objective of significantly reducing greenhouse gases.

    • And we continue to put advanced technology into our gasoline engine vehicles. Last year we introduced a new World Engine for our 4-cylinder cars and trucks, along with a new fuel-efficient continuously variable transmission.

    • Just last month we announced a $3 billion powertrain investment. This investment will include the development and production of:

    A significantly more fuel efficient V-6 engine family; and

    New cutting-edge transmissions that improve fuel economy by an additional 5-10 percent alone.

    • Plus, we will double the production capacity of our 30 plus mpg 4-cylinder engine plant in Michigan to 840,000 units per year.

    • All in all, these investments will further secure tens of thousands of U.S. jobs associated with the engineering and manufacturing of the vehicles that will benefit from these new technologies.

    • We’re also addressing our product mix. Earlier this year, we announced a 40-plus mpg “Smart” city car that will arrive in the U.S. early next year.

    I’ve focused on what we are doing, from a technology perspective, to reduce petroleum consumption – and, since they are directly related, greenhouse gases. But I need to mention one more item in this vein. For those who advocate 4 percent annual CAFE increases over the next 10 years—which translates to a 50 percent fuel economy increase—we know how to do that, too.

    In fact, we already do it…in Europe. The U.S. combined fleet averages 24-25 mpg, and in Europe the fleet averages 36 mpg. That’s a 50 percent difference.

    Why is there a huge disparity between our fleets there and here? After all, we are the same companies in Europe that we are in the U.S., with access to similar technologies. The difference is the European approach to energy and greenhouse gas policies. They’ve made some tough political choices. They’ve highly taxed gasoline, making the price three times higher than in the U.S., and they have incentives on diesel fuel. As a result of these policies, fuel economy is always high on a customer’s list, and not just when there’s a spike in fuel prices.

    Through policies which affect consumer demand, the mix of vehicles sold in Europe is radically different than here – about 60 percent compacts or smaller, compared to about 15 percent here; and about 50 percent of passenger vehicles are diesel powered.

    There’s no magic at work here. A gas-engine mid-size car in Europe gets the same mileage as a gas-engine mid-size car in the U.S. It’s just that customers demand a very different mix of vehicles in Europe.

    The European model, while far from perfect, is based on policies that leverage demand and market forces, not on policies that fight them.

    However, in the U.S., our policies have historically addressed the supply side – light-duty vehicle fuel-economy standards. But, consider how a 50-percent fuel-economy improvement relates to new vehicle technology alone. If all the new vehicles sold in the U.S. 10 years from now were hybrids or diesels – something that no one really believes is feasible – fuel economy would improve by only 25-30 percent.

    U.S. policymakers must adopt a new and unique formula that fits here. DaimlerChrysler supports a three-pronged, comprehensive approach to climate change and energy security; one that includes a combination of:
    • vehicle efficiency improvements;
    • the expanded use of alternative fuels – such as ethanol and biodiesel; and,
    • the harnessing of market forces to help drive consumer demand.

    We all need to be very clear on one point – new vehicle efficiency improvements alone will never result in the overall decline in petroleum consumption and greenhouse gas emissions we need. The demand for fuel will continue to grow, as more drivers enter the market and vehicles are driven longer distances.

    There are more than 230 million light-duty vehicles currently in use today in the U.S. which travel nearly 3 trillion miles. That is nearly 13,000 miles traveled by each vehicle, each year—an increase of about 30 percent since 1985. Thus, greenhouse gases and the demand for petroleum will not be offset by only addressing efficiency improvements among the 16-17 million new vehicles that enter the U.S. market each year. In order to decrease total greenhouse gas emissions and petroleum consumption, we need to accelerate the adoption of alternative fuels such as E85 and bio-diesel, which will affect a greater proportion of the population of light duty vehicles.

    And by the way, while travel is growing in the U.S., it will grow exponentially as China and India increase the global automotive market dramatically. The combined Indian and Chinese existing car fleet will almost triple during the next 10 years to about 90 million vehicles, while the U.S. fleet is forecast to grow 25 percent.

    To address this increase in demand, we need a comprehensive approach that addresses energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from all sectors of the U.S. economy, and encourages the most efficient reductions in energy use. Our approach should not just address the supply of energy-efficient products, but also spur demand for them, while establishing reasonable time-tables for compliance and realistic levels of reductions.

    Although it should go without saying, I’ll say it anyway: This effort needs to be national in scope. We need to avoid an unacceptable and inefficient patchwork of inconsistent Federal, State, and local approaches. In fact, to truly be effective in curbing greenhouse gases, we need a global solution.

    On the vehicle efficiency side, we at DaimlerChrysler recognize the need for action. And we’re taking it. Every day, our engineers are working to reduce greenhouse gases and petroleum consumption. We absolutely will be part of the solution and we will accelerate our efforts. We also support reforming the CAFE program to base it on vehicle attributes and pledge to continue to work with NHTSA to establish maximum feasible levels of fuel economy—levels that are based on sound science and that recognize the limits of technology, cost, and consumer demand.

    But again, if we intend to make meaningful progress in reducing petroleum consumption in this country, in addition to vehicle technology improvements, we look to the Federal Government to establish policies that address consumer demand and bend the bias of transportation fuels toward lower carbon alternatives.

    Thank you and I look forward to answering your questions.

    UAW not ready to concede Chrysler will be sold

    Automotive News / March 14, 2007 - 6:00 am

    DETROIT (Reuters) -- The United Auto Workers union wants to see German automaker DaimlerChrysler AG hold on to the Chrysler group, the president of the union said on Tuesday, March 13, adding that he was "not ready to concede" a spin-off was inevitable.

    UAW President Ron Gettelfinger, who sits on DaimlerChrysler's supervisory board, said the union had been surprised by the February announcement that DaimlerChrysler was open to a sale of Chrysler group, which represents the Jeep, Dodge and Chrysler brands.

    "Our initial reaction was like everybody else. It caught us off guard. It took us by surprise," Gettelfinger told radio station WJR in an interview. "Certainly we want to keep DaimlerChrysler. We want to keep the Chrysler group in that family. That's our objective."

    Gettelfinger, who will lead the UAW in a crucial round of contract talks with the Detroit-based automakers set to begin this summer, said that a sale of Chrysler was not inevitable.

    "I've been around the process long enough to know that I'm not ready to concede that the Chrysler group is going to come out of DaimlerChrysler," Gettelfinger said in the WJR interview.

    If Chrysler is sold, Gettelfinger said the UAW would prefer to see it end up with an automotive buyer rather than a private equity fund.

    "It does make sense that it would stay in the auto group. I think everybody would prefer that," he said.

    General Motors and a number of private equity firms, including Cerberus Capital Management and The Blackstone Group, have emerged as potential bidders for Chrysler.

    DaimlerChrysler executives have said they will not have a traditional auction for Chrysler and will share financial information on the automaker selectively.

    Chrysler has announced plans to cut a total of 13,000 jobs, or about 16 percent of its work force, in a bid to return to return to profitability by 2008.

    Gettelfinger declined to comment on the upcoming contract talks with Chrysler, GM and Ford Motor Co.

    "I've said this before. Negotiation is very difficult regardless of the circumstances that exist," he said

    Europe's Airbus Unions to Strike Friday

    AP | AOIFE WHITE | 03.14.07, 12:25 PM - ETAirbus unions said Wednesday that workers in France, Germany and Spain would strike Friday to protest the aircraft maker's plans to cut 10,000 jobs and spin off or close six European plants.

    The European Metalworkers' Federation said its member unions at all of Airbus' French and German plants would stop work, while in Spain 9,000 workers at Airbus' three factories and other sites owned by its parent company EADS would walk off the job for an hour.

    It said there would be a mass demonstration in front of EADS headquarters in Paris and some 20,000 people were expected to join a large protest in the German port city of Hamburg, with smaller demonstrations outside Spanish production sites.

    Trade unions in supplier companies based in Belgium and the Netherlands would support Airbus workers by traveling to the protests in neighboring countries, it said. There are no plans for workers to demonstrate in Brussels.

    Socialist lawmakers at the European Parliament called on Airbus employees to stay firm in the face of restructuring plans, saying they would ask EADS unions to talk to them in Brussels on March 28 and 29 and had not ruled out meeting Airbus co-Chief Executive Louis Gallois at a later date.

    "Management errors lie behind Airbus' difficulties," said Martin Schulz, the leader of the Parliament's pan-European Socialist group. "It is all the more shocking to see today that it's the workers who pay the price and not the shareholders."

    Gallois last week urged politicians not to interfere in how the company managed its business.

    Ahead of France's April 22-May 6 two-round presidential election, most candidates have pushed for state intervention to help rescue the company from its troubles, largely caused by a weaker U.S. dollar and a 5 billion euros ($6.5 billion) profit shortfall due to the A380 superjumbo's two-year delay.

    Besides the job cuts - of which 4,300 would be made in France - Airbus plans to sell or close three plants and find industrial partners to take over and upgrade three more facilities producing fuselage and wing parts. Two of the six affected sites are in France, three in Germany and one in Britain.

    The French government currently owns 15 percent of European Aeronautic Defence & Space Co. NV, while Paris-based Lagardere SCA owns 7.5 percent. Their combined stake is balanced by Stuttgart, Germany-based DaimlerChrysler AG, which holds 22.5 percent of voting rights in the defense group.

    Spindle for sale

    Click on image to enlarge

    Statement of Thomas W. LaSorda, President and Chief Executive Officer DaimlerChrysler Corporation

        WASHINGTON, March 14 /PRNewswire-FirstCall/ -- The following is a
    statement of Thomas W. LaSorda, President and Chief Executive Officer
    DaimlerChrysler Corporation before the Subcommittee on Energy and Air
    Quality Committee on Energy and Commerce U.S. House of Representatives:
    Mr. Chairman and Members of the Committee, thank you for inviting me to
    testify before you on the subject of climate change. DaimlerChrysler is
    committed to developing new, advanced technologies, which minimize the
    effects our products and processes have on global climate and the
    environment in general. We recognize that climate change and national
    security are serious concerns that require all of us -- individuals,
    industry and government -- to take actions to help reduce our dependence on
    oil and emissions of CO2. And, we have already taken actions to do so.
    DaimlerChrysler has long been committed to reducing petroleum
    consumption and emissions of greenhouse gases of its motor vehicles.
    * We have produced more than 1.5 million flexible fuel vehicles (FFVs) --
    vehicles capable of running on E85 -- in spite of the limited
    availability of E85 fuel to consumers. That is more than 10 percent of
    our production over the past nine years, a higher percentage than any
    other manufacturer. We stand ready to make, by 2012, 50 percent of our
    production as either FFVs or vehicles capable of running on biodiesel.

    * DaimlerChrysler offers seven clean-diesel models this year -- providing
    improved fuel economy of 30 percent and greenhouse gas reductions of 20
    percent. As we announced at the Washington Auto Show in January, our
    new heavy-duty Dodge Ram diesel meets the stringent, 50-state, 2010
    emission standards TODAY. And, we are actively pushing for the adoption
    of a national standard for B20 biodiesel fuel to speed its adoption in
    the marketplace.

    * We are partners in a global alliance in hybrid development with GM and
    BMW in developing a new hybrid system that we expect will leapfrog the
    competition. The first Chrysler Group product -- the Dodge Durango --
    will be on sale in 2008.

    * DaimlerChrysler is a leader in producing hybrid diesel-electric buses
    through our Orion transit bus brand. We also have the only
    demonstration fleet of plug-in hybrids in service -- our Dodge Sprinter
    vans.

    * As you may not know, we are the world's leader in fuel cell vehicle
    production, with more than 100 vehicles -- ranging from small passenger
    cars to city transit buses -- in worldwide operation today. Thirty-two
    of these are in the U.S. We are putting significant resources into
    developing these new types of propulsion with the objective of
    significantly reducing greenhouse gases.

    * And we continue to put advanced technology into our gasoline engine
    vehicles. Last year we introduced a new World Engine for our 4-cylinder
    cars and trucks, along with a new fuel-efficient continuously variable
    transmission.

    * Just last month we announced a $3 billion powertrain investment. This
    investment will include the development and production of:
    -- A significantly more fuel efficient V-6 engine family; and
    -- New cutting-edge transmissions that improve fuel economy by an
    additional 5-10 percent alone.

    * Plus, we will double the production capacity of our 30 plus mpg 4-
    cylinder engine plant in Michigan to 840,000 units per year.

    * All in all, these investments will further secure tens of thousands of
    U.S. jobs associated with the engineering and manufacturing of the
    vehicles that will benefit from these new technologies.

    * We're also addressing our product mix. Earlier this year, we announced
    a 40-plus mpg "Smart" city car that will arrive in the U.S. early next
    year.
    I've focused on what we are doing, from a technology perspective, to
    reduce petroleum consumption -- and, since they are directly related,
    greenhouse gases. But I need to mention one more item in this vein. For
    those who advocate 4 percent annual CAFE increases over the next 10 years
    -- which translates to a 50 percent fuel economy increase -- we know how to
    do that, too.
    In fact, we already do it ... in Europe. The U.S. combined fleet
    averages 24-25 mpg, and in Europe the fleet averages 36 mpg. That's a 50
    percent difference.
    Why is there a huge disparity between our fleets there and here? After
    all, we are the same companies in Europe that we are in the U.S., with
    access to similar technologies. The difference is the European approach to
    energy and greenhouse gas policies. They've made some tough political
    choices. They've highly taxed gasoline, making the price three times higher
    than in the U.S., and they have incentives on diesel fuel. As a result of
    these policies, fuel economy is always high on a customer's list, and not
    just when there's a spike in fuel prices.
    Through policies which affect consumer demand, the mix of vehicles sold
    in Europe is radically different than here -- about 60 percent compacts or
    smaller, compared to about 15 percent here; and about 50 percent of
    passenger vehicles are diesel powered.
    There's no magic at work here. A gas-engine mid-size car in Europe gets
    the same mileage as a gas-engine mid-size car in the U.S. It's just that
    customers demand a very different mix of vehicles in Europe.
    The European model, while far from perfect, is based on policies that
    leverage demand and market forces, not on policies that fight them.
    However, in the U.S., our policies have historically addressed the
    supply side -- light-duty vehicle fuel-economy standards. But, consider how
    a 50- percent fuel-economy improvement relates to new vehicle technology
    alone. If all the new vehicles sold in the U.S. 10 years from now were
    hybrids or diesels -- something that no one really believes is feasible --
    fuel economy would improve by only 25-30 percent.
    U.S. policymakers must adopt a new and unique formula that fits here.
    DaimlerChrysler supports a three-pronged, comprehensive approach to climate
    change and energy security; one that includes a combination of:
    * vehicle efficiency improvements;
    * the expanded use of alternative fuels -- such as ethanol and biodiesel;
    and,
    * the harnessing of market forces to help drive consumer demand.
    We all need to be very clear on one point -- new vehicle efficiency
    improvements alone will never result in the overall decline in petroleum
    consumption and greenhouse gas emissions we need. The demand for fuel will
    continue to grow, as more drivers enter the market and vehicles are driven
    longer distances.
    There are more than 230 million light-duty vehicles currently in use
    today in the U.S. which travel nearly 3 trillion miles. That is nearly
    13,000 miles traveled by each vehicle, each year -- an increase of about 30
    percent since 1985. Thus, greenhouse gases and the demand for petroleum
    will not be offset by only addressing efficiency improvements among the
    16-17 million new vehicles that enter the U.S. market each year. In order
    to decrease total greenhouse gas emissions and petroleum consumption, we
    need to accelerate the adoption of alternative fuels such as E85 and
    bio-diesel, which will affect a greater proportion of the population of
    light duty vehicles.
    And by the way, while travel is growing in the U.S., it will grow
    exponentially as China and India increase the global automotive market
    dramatically. The combined Indian and Chinese existing car fleet will
    almost triple during the next 10 years to about 90 million vehicles, while
    the U.S. fleet is forecast to grow 25 percent.
    To address this increase in demand, we need a comprehensive approach
    that addresses energy use and greenhouse gas emissions from all sectors of
    the U.S. economy, and encourages the most efficient reductions in energy
    use. Our approach should not just address the supply of energy-efficient
    products, but also spur demand for them, while establishing reasonable
    time-tables for compliance and realistic levels of reductions.
    Although it should go without saying, I'll say it anyway: This effort
    needs to be national in scope. We need to avoid an unacceptable and
    inefficient patchwork of inconsistent Federal, State, and local approaches.
    In fact, to truly be effective in curbing greenhouse gases, we need a
    global solution.
    On the vehicle efficiency side, we at DaimlerChrysler recognize the
    need for action. And we're taking it. Every day, our engineers are working
    to reduce greenhouse gases and petroleum consumption. We absolutely will be
    part of the solution and we will accelerate our efforts. We also support
    reforming the CAFE program to base it on vehicle attributes and pledge to
    continue to work with NHTSA to establish maximum feasible levels of fuel
    economy -- levels that are based on sound science and that recognize the
    limits of technology, cost, and consumer demand.
    But again, if we intend to make meaningful progress in reducing
    petroleum consumption in this country, in addition to vehicle technology
    improvements, we look to the Federal Government to establish policies that
    address consumer demand and bend the bias of transportation fuels toward
    lower carbon alternatives.


    SOURCE Chrysler Group

    Daimler Patent Update


    PAT. NO.
    Title
    1 7,191,052 Full-Text Method for determining the exhaust-gas recirculation quantity
    2 7,189,185 Full-Text Method for operating a drive train in a motor vehicle
    3 7,189,046 Full-Text Transport for swap body
    4 7,188,703 Full-Text Device for establishing noise in a motor vehicle
    5 D538,452 Full-Text Surface configuration of a taillight for a vehicle
    6 D538,215 Full-Text Front face of a vehicle wheel
    7 D538,210 Full-Text Surface configuration of a hood for a vehicle
    8 D538,207 Full-Text Surface configuration of a radiator grill for a vehicle
    9 D537,767 Full-Text Front face of a vehicle wheel
    10 D537,766 Full-Text Front face of a vehicle wheel
    11 D537,760 Full-Text Surface configuration of a radiator grill for a vehicle
    12 7,186,772 Full-Text Coating composition for forming self-layering or self-coating lacquer systems
    13 7,186,351 Full-Text Injection valve
    14 7,186,076 Full-Text Exhaust gas turbine
    15 7,185,832 Full-Text Fuel injection nozzle for an internal combustion engine with direct fuel injection
    16 D537,392 Full-Text Surface configuration of a rear bumper for a vehicle
    17 7,184,871 Full-Text Distributed control unit
    18 7,182,053 Full-Text Camshaft adjuster for an internal combustion engine
    19 D537,027 Full-Text Front face of a vehicle wheel
    20 D537,021 Full-Text Surface configuration of a front bumper for a vehicle
    21 7,181,335 Full-Text Method for determining a change in air consumption for a combustion engine
    22 7,181,025 Full-Text Ultrasound based parametric loudspeaker system
    23 7,180,205 Full-Text Dual-voltage vehicle electric system
    24 7,179,063 Full-Text Reciprocating-piston machine with a sliding sleeve